Chefelf.com Night Life: Obbah - Viewing Profile

For the gaydebate:
If you believe in the Bible and want to live after it, ok. I am also sure of that you just want people well by denying them their rights, at least that part's fine with the me. But I just want to remind you of that little story about a commoner and a farisée, perhaps christians ought to inform people rather than enforce thier ideals on them?

For the Hitlerdebate:
Hitler was neither capitalist nor communist, he was officially a national socialist (a draconic utopia for us, you people, yes I mean you: RAUS!) and practically an anarchist in his thoughts about economics, although he clearly had a social liberal campaign before the elections and a fascist economy while ruling, in other words: He wanted his blonde aryans to go back to some prehistoric kind of farming economy which would be good for the natural selection, he promised the workers and farmers to confiscate jewish property (perhaps not THAT social LIBERALl after all...) for their use and giving them social security by raised taxes and his ruling lead to an economy based on cooperation between his totalitarian state and coprorations.

Just because he agreed to some liberal ideas that exist today doesn't mean he was liberal, the foundation of liberalism, to move with the times and being open to a relative view of morals he wasn't found of. Instead he had nothing against enforcing his morals on peole, something that is justificated by, that's right, conservatism.

For the debate about about God:
Come on! Comment what I wrote about the need for a good, that is a rather basic discussion I think.

Let's check the argument "it's so unnatural".

What is unnatural?
Clearly it just can't be things that occur in only one species, are ants unnatural for example?
What your term unnatural seems to mean to me is something invented, something that isn't an instinct, you are thereby implying that hetero is somekind of normal state one is born with whilst one chooses to be homosexual.
The task of giving proof is thus upon the anti-gay lobby.

Another approach is this one. What are you turning on then? I'm straight, I turn on women, or rather, I give in to natural temptations that arise when I watch women, would I care if that woman was sterile? -Hell no! Heterosexuality is thus no better than homosexuality.

There are two kinds of paedophilias, 95% act out of psycological disorders and can be treated, the others do not to any extenct at all respond to psycological treatment and say that they have discovered their sexual POV simply by watching children (ask ECPAT). Obviously straight isn't the single way to be born, furthermore:

(wikipedia)" A disease is any abnormal condition of the body or mind that causes discomfort, dysfunction, or distress to the person affected or those in contact with the person. Sometimes the term is used broadly to include injuries, disabilities, syndromes, symptoms, deviant behaviors, and atypical variations of structure and function, while in other contexts these may be considered distinguishable categories."

WHO does not consider homosexuality a disease so give up calling it unnatural!


Now, what about the sexual act itself?

Well giving in to heterosexuality is clearly a sin since all spilled seed is a sin and giving in to it would be honorig it, so what moore proof do you want for being ignorant?


To get this debate back on track, the concept of an almighty, allknowing, morally perfect creator is very new, man has for thousands of years (believing neurobiologists) made without such things, a raingod has often sufficed, leaving humans unknowing in other aspects of life, so what a fucking low selfconfidence do you need to feel a need for such a way to explain the world? Join me, the religous existenialist!:)

As I understood it it was work as norm, which I think is rather bad to provide a substitute for...

Well what is it you people want then? An utopia á la Godwin where the average working day is half an hour? One of the first things to accept in life is that absolute and maximised pleasure simply isn't possible. I can't understand the grudges you hold towrds higher education, when is it parroting except for anathomics?

I must say that I am not really happy with the way my schooling has been run so far though, here goes a list of what school has yet thought me in my eight years of it:
1. Algebra
2. English until the level after counting to 100 and naming the animals of the farm poster
3. Some french (although this is debatable, much of what I know is from what I did the summer I skipped a grade by doing the first year of it (the french) during the holidays)
4. A pathetic amount of wannabe, postmodern phrases to please all kinds of PC government officials (inclduing the classic, "You KNOW that I am right, it takes two for a quarrel, even if it has been the same five, hip guys against the one guy without friends, labeled "potential victim for a suicide" for the last four years")

What of this could be of any use? Probably most of it depending on the career I choose, although I doubt I will become someone with a need for the last. Thing is that you could probably narrow these things down to a one day week for 1-2 years plus homework, christ, what was really the irony with the Awsomedome?