[Slade]

Whaa? JM hasn't mentioned nazis in a page or two...

[J m HofMarN]

Hannibal, this is the lining of your nasal passages speaking. Please lay off the cocaine. Thanks.

[Slade]

Hey, less hate. Less hate...

And how would you explain his existance without you, Hannibal, if he existed on this board before you did?

Lets see some serious philosophical discussion on that.

[Dr Lecter]

Yeah, its just that one of my sources refered to Margaret Thacher as a Neo-Liberal, and thats like calling Bush a Neo-Marxist, thus I have to investigate who the hell wrote it.

This post has been edited by Dr Lecter: 03 April 2005 - 03:55 AM

[Slade]

wasn't she Libertarian?

Edit: No, I don't know who I was thinking of there...

This post has been edited by Slade: 03 April 2005 - 11:53 AM

[Madam Corvax]

I'll just throw my five groszy's (or ore's) worth of Nazi talk (everyone joins the discussion , looks like Nazi talk is very IN these days in the forum)

Hitler was not pro-abortion. He was all for having even more and more fair-headed blue eyed children. Encouraged evey Madchen in Germany to get impregnated by soldiers. And then naturally, Drang nach Osten came, because German people after multipying so much just had to inhabit the uncivilised the land of Slaves east of Laba.

I really admire myself for not having spoken about any Nazis so far, which is strange. But you must admit that living in Spain, Sussex or Wisconsin or whereever Thrawn is coming from is quite different than living just across the border from the home of the free, post-Weimar Republic utopia of orderliness and racial purity, in the country which suffered directly from Nazis "order"

Therefore forgive me for speaking so plainly. Everyone who is for Nazis these days is just uneducated, sick and despicable. And don't give me the freedom of speech bullshit. I don't know how it is in the States, but here in Europe there are laws against advocating the Nazis ideas. You can be put to jail for denying the existence of concentration camps, which I know some people have been doing. No freedom of speech can justify spreading the ideas of racial hatred.

Shame on everyone who thinks "Nazis are great".

Oh, and we were supposed to talk about God, right?
Ok, SS-men had palques on their chests with the words engavend on them
"Gott mit uns"

[Slade]

1. I have no mittens.

2. EVERYBODY - Please stop saying things like "All fascists are stupid jerks!" There are educated Republicans, remember. Intelligent people can still disagree on key points of ideology. Really, it's in the rules.

C. This banner ad just said that God loves me. Sounds like he's obsessive and timid, since I don't even know him. If He loves me, just have Him come and tell me, He shouldn't be hiding behind people!

[Dr Lecter]

http://us.i1.yimg.co...econdTerm_2.swf

[Madam Corvax]

2. EVERYBODY - Please stop saying things like "All fascists are stupid jerks!" There are educated Republicans, remember. Intelligent people can still disagree on key points of ideology. Really, it's in the rules.

Whaaa??? What I did say is "Everyone who is for Nazis these days is just uneducated, sick and despicable". I should have said " uneducated or sick or despicable", sorry. Uneducated, if he/she knows only partial truth of propaganda, then she/she should go and learn more that "ordrer" brought to world. "SIck" if he/she" does not understand what he/she learnt. "Despicable" is he/she did learn and condones the ideas. I never once mentioned stupid jerks.

As I said, I don't know how it is in States, but it is actually illegal here to openly support Nazis. Hence my anger. I have never, ever heard Nazis called intelligent republicans. If you are saying things like that, I seriously recommend some reserach on the subject of Nazis. Or come to Poand, visit a concentration camp or two, because it is better to see with your own eyes. I hope you will understand it then.

And you say "people can disagree on main point of ideology" Ok, if you disagree when I say we should not exterminate people of other races and nationalities by means of poisoning them with cyclone gas in concentration camps, can you do it? Sure you can, right, but if you do, they what I think of you is explained above.

And, lastly, I am again amazed. There has been so much verbal abuse, speading of racial hatred, trolling and spamming recently and you are picking on ME and threatening ME with banning for saying things like "Everyone who supports Nazis is sick?" I assume it was me you were referring to in the your next post about anger.
Sorry, I could not be but angry anger what is going on here.


So, after all this, I feel really, really unwelcome here. No-one posted such warnings after what Hannibal or Thrawn or Use the Force been doing. On the other hand, my comment immediately resulted in the banning warning. I find it curious, and I don't have any notion why you might be doing this to me.

[J m HofMarN]

You are most definately welcome here Madam, you rock hard. And I agree with you about disliking nazis even though I do try to be cordial. However I can see why you wouldnt take that approach.

[Kirby]

Wait, did slade really PM you saying that you would be banned. Well if he ever did such a thing I would be ready to go Jay and Silent Bob on all yous guyes asses.
Really we all love you too much to do that.

Dr. Lecter: Come on, at least my do-nothing-but-damn-funny link had a picture to show me what I was in for. But the loading jig was damn groovy.

This post has been edited by Kirby: 04 April 2005 - 12:09 AM

[Madam Corvax]

Kirby, no, Slade DID NOT PM me with a ban warning. But he posted a general warning in the thread “Anger” just after he replied to my “angry about Nazis” post(approximately three minutes later).
I assume it was done as a result of my post, and as I say, in such case I am amazed if it was only this particular bit that prompted him to issue a warning, while people openly supporting deadly ideologies have been walking fee around here for some time.

[Dr Lecter]

Nazism isn't all that bad, if you remove the rascism.

[civilian_number_two]

Yeah, and Ed Geen wasn't so bad, apart from all the killing.

[Dr Lecter]

Isn't it strange, one nation commits a genocide during a world war, and most people don't even know it happened and yet the entire race of people was wiped out. Then, next world war, another nation does the same, but many of them showed mercy and there were many survives because of the mercy of many of the nazis.

During the Armenian Genocide, there were only a few thousand survivors, and the Turks showed no mercy. During the Holocaust, there were millions or survivors, and yet the Armenian Genocide remains somewhat forgot. Considering the Armenians were Christians, and we live in a right wing nutcase chritian domiated world would would think that this genocide would'nt be forgotten.

1. The Holocaust was nowhere near the first genocide, hell it wasn't even the first of the 20th Century. It happened long before nazism existed and normally the entire race was killed, in this case not.
2. Its also strange that everyone picks up on the nazi war crimes, when the allies too were bombing Berlin to rumble. Often dropping more bombs in a single raid than the Germans did in an entire week. Millions of civilian Germans were killed by the allied forces. I didn't see Winston Churchill, Franklin D Roosevelt, the RAF or the US Air Force on trial after the war, even though by the pure defination of a war crime they committed. Just because one side is killing innocents doesn't mean it becomes a free for all party. Don't even think about giving the whole "they had no choice bullshit" theres a difference between destroying entire cities and hitting military targets and its about time someone learnt it.