Is the catholic church a cult? Sensitive subject off the port bow!
#46
Posted 24 April 2005 - 04:11 PM
#47
Posted 24 April 2005 - 04:12 PM
So your reasons are that you want to discredit Catholicism? Do you actually, truly believe wholeheartedly that they are a cult, or is it a convenient argument to suit your purposes?
I think it would do more harm than good. There are plenty of harmful religions in the world, and I'd much rather that the general public become disillusioned for the right reasons - ie that the Catholic Church is, and I quote myself, "an extremist group with way too much influence that promotes dangerous ways of thinking."
Catholics (and indeed, most extremist followers of any religion) often do believe this. Isn't it fortunate that the rest of us are much more broadminded, hmm?
As I said before, "'Cult' is often a term that's used to describe 'any religion that I don't agree with'." I didn't say that any new religion that starts out is a cult, and I didn't say that they aren't often mislabelled so, either through deliberate smear tactics or just skepticism. What I did say is that the Catholic Church is not a cult, as you purport it to be.
Sigh. How would they not be different? You've read my reasons and definitions that distinguish them, haven't you?
This is very presumptuous of you. 'Aggressively seeking new members' is not the same as 'badgering people to join and give them lots of money". And if they were a 'true' religion, they would probably not do this. Few actual religions start out with the intention of becoming a religion... usually some guy just comes up with a new life philosophy that appeals to a great number of people who then venerate him and the philosophy to the point of worship, with this veneration getting more potent over time (especially after his death, when his teachings can be 'reinterpreted').
Why? It fulfils all the basic characteristics of a religion, especially the 'worshipping of an established deity' part. The Catholic Church wouldn't agree naturally, but not everyone is a hardcore Catholic. And occasionally, Catholics can be quite *gasp* liberal.
I'm finding it hard to have a rational debate here when your basic line of argument, one that keeps coming up again and again under different phrasings, is 'Catholicism is evil, therefore it is a cult'.
Download both 'Adaware' and 'Spybot: Search And Destroy' and run them. Yes, both of them. Each of them tends to pick up stuff that the other cannot. If that still doesn't work, download the latest copy of 'HijackThis', and post the log on these forums (assuming that you aren't familiar enough with Registry Values to figure out which ones to delete manually).
#48
Posted 24 April 2005 - 04:14 PM
#49
Posted 24 April 2005 - 05:34 PM
Have you even read the bible, Rhubarb? He was not a humaniarian at all. Jesus spoke more on the perils of hell than he did the riches of heaven. In short, he basically said- I'm the way to God, there is no other way to heaven, follow me or be doomed.
He lost his temper with the aposltes on numerous occasions, knocked over stores, and called people "broods of vipers' and 'blind'. He was very cut and dry. Sure he healed the sick and spoke highly of the poor, but his main message was salvation, not humanitarianism. Doing unto others as they do unto you is good and all, but if you do follow that rule and still endore atheism or any other religon, according to JC, you're fucked.
If you hate religon and churches, then go for it, but don't pussy out and start going on about how good a guy Christ was, because accroding to his word, you're screwed with your current mind set.
"I hate religon and the church, but Jesus was a nice person" Bah, PC bullshit.
If you're looking for a hero, go to Cyrus the Great, he wrote the first charter on human rights. Of course, the bible deemed him as a 'good leader' so on the count he must be a bastard.
#50
Posted 24 April 2005 - 05:36 PM
Eeeeehehehehehehehe. Those guys were Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreat, like Tony the Tiger when he sprinkles a cocoa-based powder on his Frosties instead of sugar.
Y'know when Orwell wrote "if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever" in Nineteen Eighty-Four? Well, to paraphrase, "if you want picture of rational debate with these people, imagine banging your head off a brick wall - forever".
Such a shame they took down the forum.
Also, slightly on topic - the Roman Church does indeed still excommunicate 'heretics', or did so as late as the 1980's anyway. There were a whole bunch of Liberation Theologists chucked out for stuff like, helping poor people empower themselves and fuck out dictators and other unchristian works.
This post has been edited by MacGyver's Mullet: 24 April 2005 - 05:39 PM
#51
Posted 24 April 2005 - 06:09 PM
Yes, I've read the Bible, although only once all the way through, when I was at school and it occurred to me one day to actually find out what was in this thing they were making me study, and I remember thinking that this Jesus fellow was not such a bad guy. As I said before, I have no Bible here in this flat and can't prove or disprove anything with actual chapter and verse, but I distinctly remember being one very surprised angsty teen when my research came up with a lot of 'PC bullshit' from his teachings that I actually agreed with. I kind of like the Bible. Even the psycho stuff is entertaining at the very least.
Alright, I'll concede that point. He was a bit of a raving nutter, by all accounts. I'm not saying that he was all-round wonderful and everything he said was gold. I'm sure he went around preaching a lot of stuff I wouldn't agree with. But I still think he had a lot of decent ideas consistant with humanitarianism, and would be someone I wouldn't mind having a pint with, if I could filter out his mutterings. This is all speculation, of course, since he's long dead and his teachings reinterpreted hundreds of times over. Ain't diversity wonderful?
Anyway. May I have some quotes, please?
It's okay for me to hate religion and churches?
Ooh, you were doing so well up until then.
MacGyver's Mullet - They took it down? I didn't even notice. I bet it's up again elsewhere on the web, though. Those people need each other... unison through inanity and so forth.
This post has been edited by Rhubarb: 24 April 2005 - 06:11 PM
#53
Posted 24 April 2005 - 07:30 PM
Shame there's not much to read now... the threads have all died of old age. There was some classic stuff in the Science section.
I ALIENATE YOU ALL
#54
Posted 24 April 2005 - 07:36 PM
![sad.gif](http://www.chefelf.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)
Less Is More v4
Now resigned to a readership of me, my cat and some fish
#55
Posted 25 April 2005 - 12:00 AM
Ok, so you DID read it, and then posted to say that you hadn't. Wow. I guess this was to hurt my feelings. I am crying as I type this, and will likely commit suicide later. I hope you are happy!
#56
Posted 25 April 2005 - 02:42 AM
Actually, I'm pretty sure it was Dr Lecter who said he couldn't be arsed to read the thread, and since he agreed with me, I'm hardly going to slag him off am I? Seriously, I'm sorry you feel bad, but being fully engaged in the titanic struggle between good and evil that is the argument between me and Rhubarb(I'll leave it to you to decide which one is which) it was rather annoying to have to repeat myself. Not that its a crime to accidently repeat ideas already brought up, I have a nasty feeling I did this myself in the girls vs boys thread on chefelf myself, but the girls vs boys thing was over 12 pages at the time I posted, and this one was only 3. On something like this its important to keep up with every point made so you don't get left behind.
#57
Posted 25 April 2005 - 11:29 AM
-civ (chose life!)
This post has been edited by Yahtzee: 25 April 2005 - 04:49 PM
#58
Posted 26 April 2005 - 02:33 AM
![blink.gif](http://www.chefelf.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)
the problem... is that there are too many groups calling them selves 'satanists'
and they give themselves a bad name by mostly being idiots, but then each group gives each other an even worse name by being dumber....
the satanists of the 60s came up with cool music and film...
everyone after that was a tubby goth who couldn't get a girlfriend and though saying he was a satanist would make him contraversial enough to get a girl friend...
i don't know which is sadder, the pathetic guy, or the lame cow that went out with him...
This post has been edited by barend: 26 April 2005 - 02:34 AM
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)
#60
Posted 26 April 2005 - 06:58 AM
Its like saying "Don't be silly, I'm sure those mushrooms are perfectly harmless" or "Sure fuck it. I'm sure the handgun isn't loaded. Let the little angel play with it if he wants to." Its just asking fate to punch you in the nuts.