[Emu]

I spent like ten hours on problem 2 of my AI homework. and I've finally finished. which means that now I get to do problem 3. bahah. and I've lost count of how much chai I've had in the past twelve hours somewhere around the 5th cup. yummy yummy chai. oh sleep deprivation, I thought I had rid myself of your....sleep....deprivation....ness.

[SimeSublime]

You know that will never happen.

Firstly, confusion to previous comment: Why the hell do you have a fox news day?

Secondly, my complaint: Thesis.

Thirdly:

[Mirithorn]

We have a fox news day because apparently some politcal-y person whose name I have forgotten REALLY LIKES fox news.

I also have sleep deprivation. I'd forgotten that I could stay alive for four weeks at a time on four hours of sleep a night, but I don't seem to be dead yet. Yay?

[Sailor Abbey]

Complaint: toosspoildis008 is getting on my nerves. Somebody kill that guy already.

[Grinov]

Complaint: toosspoildis008 is getting on my nerves. Somebody kill that guy already.

Who is he, a rogue member or something? There was that other guy too.

[Deepsycher]

If spammers had to pay to join up I think it may be less likely for them joining in the first place because it might not be a profitable venture for them. To me this is an example of commercialism attempting to corrupt free areas.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 21 September 2006 - 10:31 AM

[Grinov]

If spammers had to pay to join up I think it may be less likely for them joining in the first place because it might not be a profitable venture for them. To me this is an example of commercialism attempting to corrupt free areas.

Are you willing to pay to be on these forums?

[Deepsycher]

I knew you would ask that which is why I didn't put in "The sad thing about this method is that less people may be attracted to join and certainly not for those who don't have any money." Lets raise the accessible level and I can see another message from that. Solves some of the problems out of desperation to pay for it but not the problem of those who cannot afford to pay. I think I mention that back some months ago somewhere.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 21 September 2006 - 10:41 AM

[Sailor Abbey]

I might pay. But not very much. Maybe like... 50cents a month or something. But thats it.

[Grinov]

I knew you would ask that which is why I didn't put in "The sad thing about this method is that less people may be attracted to join and certainly not for those who don't have any money." Lets raise the accessible level and I can see another message from that. Solves some of the problems out of desperation to pay for it but not the problem of those who cannot afford to pay. I think I mention that back some months ago somewhere.

I am not going to pay over the internet for anything.

[Deepsycher]

I like to think of solutions all way round. Another idea of mine is for the joiners to be asked questions by the site owners about their purpose here but that could add a lot of overhead and time.

Well what I am trying to avoid is services that charge people per what they use such as charging for bandwidth. I think these companies are not fully equipped to handle the amount of customers they wish to have. So what they do is put a 10 people in a 5 carrier boat. So as 5 would have to get out and swim and take their turn as in the similar way of people being limited by bandwidth.

[Grinov]

I like to think of solutions all way round. Another idea of mine is for the joiners to be asked questions by the site owners about their purpose here but that could add a lot of overhead and time.

Well what I am trying to avoid is services that charge people per what they use such as charging for bandwidth. I think these companies are not fully equipped to handle the amount of customers they wish to have. So what they do is put a 10 people in a 5 carrier boat. So as 5 would have to get out and swim and take their turn as in the similar way of people being limited by bandwidth.

I think the system we have now is alright, if there are spammer they are banned, simple.

[Deepsycher]

I thought the same a couple of weeks ago. So far from yesterday three as I account. Now I think if they are bots people have found a way to penetrate by them signing up quickly. At this rate soon when they progress there could be a never ending cycle of that, of them writing spam all over the place whilst time is being spent avoiding and removing them.

"How about when this simple idea turns into a complex one for when the place is flooded with spammers who write adverts to their site all over?"

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 21 September 2006 - 11:25 AM

[Grinov]

I thought the same a couple of weeks ago. So far from yesterday three as I account. Now I think if they are bots people have found a way to penetrate by them signing up quickly. At this rate soon when they progress there could be a never ending cycle of that, of them writing spam all over the place whilst time is being spent to avoid and remove them.

"How about when this simple idea turns into a complex one for when the place is flooded with spammers who write adverts to their site all over?"

Then we get more moderators.

[Deepsycher]

Maybe it might be fun for some, me I'd get bored wouldn't you?. Okay I admit the price idea (I wouldn't put it to practice) was a bit too rough.