Still, the commentary on the topic title is unnecessary. It would have taken you all of 2-3 minutes of reading a topic with Blizzard in the title to determine that it was regarding Diablo 3. Did you think acting like a child would make you some friends?
Oh please. You say I'm acting like a child when it was clearly an attempt at humour. Anyone who had taken 20 seconds to read my comment then read Goat's would have realised that I had obviously copied it, and that was my intention.
Then in reply to Goat's comment, I showed him that it was a D3 topic, or at least that was the attention. Only then did I insult him with 'are you quite done or would you like to continue?' That was only pointing out that he should have read the topic before posting his remark, albeit an arrogant point.
Did I go to far or resort to childish humour?
I don't think so.
Retardation aside, if it's really necessary to completely disregard the other topic, continue the discussion here - from the gameplay videos, are people right in feeling that D3 is out of cannon with it's prequels, in regards to the 'feel and look'?
I'm mostly curious on plot canon. When they started toying around with the warcraft canon so make WoW fit it made me ill.
The 'feel and look', which I've heard from quite a few people now, is something I can't understand. If it's still the same controls and the same isometric view then I don't see how it could look or feel different.
But then, maybe it'd be like if I saw a third Baldur's Gate as I never really was hugely interested in Diablo 2.