[Ninja Duck]

Adolf Hitler, Sisters Taken from Parents' Home
By VINCE LATTANZIO
Updated 8:17 AM EST, Thu, Jan 15, 2009

Sgt. John Harris with Holland Township Police was asked to escort staff from the NJ Division of Youth and Family Services to the Cambell’s home in Holland Township, N.J. last Friday.

Harris said they had come to investigate a complaint related to the Campbell’s three children – Adolf Hitler Campbell, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell.

In the end, the agency chose to remove the children from their parents’ care, but they assured Harris it was not because of the children’s names.

“They assured me that removing the children had nothing to do with their names or the birthday cake incident. There were other factors that we were not privy to,” Harris told NBC10’s Doug Shimell Wednesday.

The sergeant said based on his personal experiences with Heath Campbell he could not think what the circumstances would be.

“Just from knowing Mr. Campbell from the past ten or so years, I've never known him to abuse his children and when he has talked about his children he has been very much into his kids. Very loving,” Harris said.

A custody hearing is scheduled for Thursday in Flemington.

Remember 3-year-old Adolf Hitler Campbell?

He’s the little boy whose name was the center of an international firestorm last December after a Greenwich, N.J., supermarket refused to write his name on a birthday cake. The store said it was inappropriate and refused to give an apology after the parents demanded one.

Adolf and his two sisters -- one-year-old JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell and 8-month-old Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell -- were removed from their parents’ home Tuesday night by the New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services, Holland Township police chief David Van Gilson told LehighValleyLive.com.

It is unclear why the children were removed from their parent’s home. Gilson said his department did not receive any reports of abuse or negligence.

Heath and Deborah Campbell, the children's parents, were scheduled to appear for an undisclosed hearing Tuesday, but it was postponed, according to the website.

Due to confidentiality laws, Kate Bernyk with the N.J. Division of Youth and Family Services would not comment or even acknowledge any involvement with the Campbells when NBC10’s Doug Shimell contacted them.

DYFS isn’t talking much about the Campbell’s situation, but the kids being taken away has nothing to do with the names and birthday cake issue in December, according to Sgt. John Harris, Holland Twp. Police in Milford, N.J.

Calls to the children’s parents were met with a message that the line had been temporarily disconnected.

http://www.nbcphilad...rents-Home.html

I think that naming your child "JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell" is a 100% valid reason to take someone's children away, as well as their right to have more children. But I'm disappointed that the police just snatched the babies away without giving the obvious reason. Bad police. No donut for you.

[Gobbler]

... Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell.

I'm just completely stuck here, trying to figure this name out. The other ones were pretty obvious, but this... Hinler, okay, that might be a dyslexic's hint at Himmler... but Honszlynn? The hell is that? Some twisted way of spelling the cute version of Hans? Hänschen? Though it sounds like they tried to name a girl there...

[Spoon Poetic]

"Hons Lynn Hiller/Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbel was named after Heinrich Luitpold Himmler a Nazi German politician who was the leader of the Schutzstaffel also called SS under Adolf Hitler." ~Some website.
*shrug* close enough, I guess?

I really, REALLY hope they had a valid reason for seizing the children. Otherwise these stupid Nazi fuckers have a case to win.

[Gobbler]

I still find it puzzling why they even allow such names. Here they usually won't even register them if they're offensive or likely to get the kids into trouble like harassment and all that...

[Spoon Poetic]

First Amendment, I guess. But once the parents win a giant lawsuit and get their kids back, those kids will be raised as white supremacists, and will looove their names. Very rarely do kids enthusiastically raised as white supremacists break out of that, unfortunately.

[J m HofMarN]

I'm with Gobbler, the names alone are reason to take the kids away from these fruit loops. I mean, sure you can raise your kids as racists if you absolutely have to, we can't say thats grounds for the state taking custody, but to put it so clearly out there is endangering the children. Although it would make for a reeeeal interesting career in most professional sports.

"And here's Adolf Hitler Campbell taking to the court and... oooh that's going to be a technical foul. And fans, if you're just tuning in, Campbell already has broken the world record for most fouls taken in any sport, ever! And now I believe they've got the blood off the court so we're back to the game!"

[Spoon Poetic]

Doesn't matter what your opinion on their names or racism though - if they were taken away solely because of their names or white supremacist views, then they have a case and they WILL win. Yes I agree that these people should have been recipients of the Darwin Awards, but the fact of the matter is that if there has been no child abuse (or substance abuse in the home), then it was illegal for those children to have been taken away. Unfortunately.

If the police end up having to admit they didn't have a valid reason to take the children, I'd bet my hair that there will be a high-dollar court case, and the ACLU will probably get involved, and Hitler's mommy and daddy will win - there's no way around it.

Which is why, I know this sounds awful to wish that a child has been abused, but I'm hoping there was a legitimate reason for those children to be taken away, so that they now have a chance to start over and NOT be raised as white supremacists, and so that this now-famous white supremacist couple doesn't get riches added to their fame/infamy, making them much more capable of spreading their "white power" shit.

[civilian_number_two]

Probably when they win thir lawsuit, they will have money to move out of their shitty lives and they wil lose some of the impotent rage that made them racist prick in the first place. Then after two years when they have squandered away their money on liquor and bingo, they'll blame it on the black man and go back to normal.

[Vesuvius]

Then after two years when they have squandered away their money on liquor and bingo, they'll blame it on the black man and go back to normal.

I was thinking the same thing!

[Slade]

I'ma have to put forth the argument that teaching children to be ignorant racists / having them in that sort of environment is certainly abuse and neglect. It stifles their personal growth and turns them into automatons of hate.

[civilian_number_two]

LOL then we should outlaw the South!

[J m HofMarN]

Problem there, Slade, is that once that precedent is set you can push it. If I want to pass on ideas about disliking Jews, Mexicans, or blacks to my kids, then they can arrest me, maybe that makes sense. But what about if I teach my kids that, say, the South should have won the civil war? Now, needless to say this is seditious talk, but its certainly free speach. What if I were to teach them to hate communists, and ergo, as Obama is clearly a socialist, to hate him? Opposite, what if I tell them George Bush is the devil? Surely I am inciting them to hatred still.

It's a slippery slope argument sure, but I'm more than happy to apply that to any free speech issue even if I find its abuse repugnant, and in this case it surely is both repugnant and rather obvious.

[SimeSublime]

I remember hearing last year about a girl over east who was named something along the lines of 'Tahula does the Hoola in Hawaii'. I know the court forced her name to be changed, but I'm not sure if they also declared the parents unfit to raise her on those grounds. I was too busy laughing at the name to listen to the story.

[Vesuvius]

I remember hearing last year about a girl over east who was named something along the lines of 'Tahula does the Hoola in Hawaii'. I know the court forced her name to be changed, but I'm not sure if they also declared the parents unfit to raise her on those grounds. I was too busy laughing at the name to listen to the story.

I was laughing when I heard that one too and I thought of that case when I first read this one. Only problem is that I didn't remember the poor gilrs name.

That's just sick.

[Casual]

This reminds me of an unfortunate case over here where some twit called her twins fish and chips. The kids were taken into care, not sure if that was the reason or not.

JM is kind of mirroring my thoughts here its a very slippery slope deciding what exactly can and can't be included in "free speech". On the other hand calling your child Adolf Hitler is clearly repugnant. Swings and roundabouts.