hey... where have you been?
Michael Jackson: GUILTY OR NOT GUILTY?
#31
Posted 15 June 2005 - 11:18 PM
>>The Adventures of Heinrich Von Bastard<< (A Web Comic)
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)
#33
Posted 16 June 2005 - 09:16 AM
QUOTE (J m HofMarN @ Jun 15 2005, 10:01 PM)
I never watched the news so I was immune, I just read. And why is it that everyone completely ignored my point and continued to just randomly state that he definately did it. Consider this:
If a parent is willing to do something horrible like let their child get molested for money, then wouldnt they be willing to accuse an innocent man for money if no molestation had occured?
Come on, it's simple logic and its more than enough to create reasonable doubt.
....
No hard evidence, no reliable witnesses. Moreover Jackson does not fit the profile of a sex offender, either mentally or physically.
If a parent is willing to do something horrible like let their child get molested for money, then wouldnt they be willing to accuse an innocent man for money if no molestation had occured?
Come on, it's simple logic and its more than enough to create reasonable doubt.
....
No hard evidence, no reliable witnesses. Moreover Jackson does not fit the profile of a sex offender, either mentally or physically.
One man's "randomly stating that he definitely did it" is another's "randomly stating that he definitely didn't do it"!
Apparently this forum isn't the only place in the world where, surprise surprise, people reading the same sets of facts draw different conclusions. The jury forman has stated publicly that he believes that Michael Jackson has molested boys in the past, but he voted to acquit because he didn't think it could be proved in this trial about this accuser.
As for no reliable witnesses, I think it should be noted that child sexual abuse is notoriously difficult to prove: child abuse victims are often very bad witnesses, and that there is often no "hard evidence" at all. And as far as him not fitting the profile, well, I suppose that is a matter of some debate!
#34
Posted 16 June 2005 - 11:55 AM
Jen- I certainly wasn't refering to you because you seem to have an actual knowledge of the facts. Many of those in favor of a conviction seem to just be doing it based on looks and general weirdness.
Quote
I don't know about you but I have never advocated that homosexuals, for any reason, be cut out of their mother's womb and thrown into a bin.