Censoring the Net
#33
Posted 24 February 2006 - 08:43 AM
I love when people take on my slang.
JM's official press secretary, scientific advisor, diplomat and apparent antagonist?
#34
Posted 24 February 2006 - 10:35 AM
I can't believe your tempting me to make that post again!
#35
Posted 26 February 2006 - 09:56 PM
Also reading that someone got 10 years just for talking about the jail system, and yet they use the excuses as secrets, not to investigate if it violates the country’s security. If it was not so bad, what have they got to worry about? Are they not humane enough to admit how they treat their citizens unequally in prison? Followed that they got a reputation to preserve in the same image of communism based on their own secrets on how it should be.
http://www.rsf.org/a...d_article=14272
Still going on and I read that Yahoo gave out the information to the Chinese government leading to the arrest; I did say earlier that some governments could “sensor” people to censor them in court for profit except this is for another purpose involving abusive treatments and brainwashing.
I can slightly see when they say “the Chinese are not to be trusted”, manufacturing of some dangerous goods and the experiences of Chinese take aways but I do not believe for every Chinese person or place. Confused over "no respectful rights for two years", what I understand here is that they can do whatever they like to the depths of murder, and as a secret it can be possible to class that like an accident, is that not right?
This to me is like a form of slavery, abusing, attacking and murdering people uncivilised secretly. It has gone public, so here are some pictures of people who were tortured:
http://www.faluninfo...torturemethods2
Other than what I hear about those who visit China, this is for me to think twice about. What do you think of the information and the pictures of the tortures, do they appear fake or convincing?
This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 26 February 2006 - 10:07 PM
#36
Posted 26 February 2006 - 10:39 PM
people are fucked where ever you go... it's the one constant on the planet.
and lecter... what problem are you having with my statement?
(i think you misunderstand my argument)
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)
#38
Posted 26 February 2006 - 11:08 PM
communism put into practice by everyone so far = wow, that f-ing sucks. Glad I live in the US
the idea of democracy = hey not bad, of, by, and for "the people"
democracy put into practice by US = only stupid people are being fooled by us nowadays, and we're still getting away with all of this shit
the idea of theocracy = well, if I'm a part of that religion, it would probably be a very good place to live
theocracy put into practice = We have so been screwing you over and you still haven't figured it out.
the idea of monarchy (assuming that all of the nobles and royalty truly care about the people's wellbeing) = probably the best in my opinion
monarchy put into practice = just revolt, your rulers probably suck and it isn't worth waiting for things to get better.
Need I go on?
"And the Evil that was vanquished shall rise anew. Wrapped in the guise of man shall he walk amongst the innocent and Terror shall consume they that dwell upon the Earth. The skies will rain fire. The seas shall become as blood. The righteous shall fall before the wicked! And all creation shall tremble before the burning standards of Hell!" - Mephisto
Kurgan X showed me this web comic done with Legos. It pokes fun at all six Star Wars films and I found it to be extremely entertaining.
<a href="http://www.irregularwebcomic.net/cast/starwars.html" target="_blank">http://www.irregularwebcomic.net/cast/starwars.html</a>
#39
Posted 26 February 2006 - 11:19 PM
(1) Everyone gets equal for what they need but not restricted within reason.
(2) Bartering introduced as an attempt to make a fair living to others.
(3) Parliaments, MP's are voted by the people based on their performances and not the other way round.
(4) There are no leaders in parliament but instead every party gets a role to serve in the country.
(5) Any conflictions are dealt in the best interest of both sides by trying to find solutions that work effectively.
(6) The pay remains the same as public pay and bonuses are based on performances of public satisfactory.
Is any of this or something like this possible?
I will return later.
This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 26 February 2006 - 11:40 PM
#40
Posted 27 February 2006 - 02:53 AM
Even there own people see it. My good pal has told me that when he lived their, he felt the government, through the school system, tried to poison peoples minds. They even preach Western Hate. They focus on drugs and crime.
It's almost embarissing at this point. I wonder why the US never tried to invade them. Why did the US become so lax about Chinese communism? Was it because of North Korea? Why did they allow North Korea to stand? I never understood Nam or Korea. It seems like the US pussied out.
This post has been edited by Jordan: 27 February 2006 - 02:54 AM
#41
Posted 27 February 2006 - 08:14 AM
I think America could have a reputation to keep up on not bombing everywhere, but why bomb China if it is one of the goldmines for the manufacturing and mass production of the cheapest goods globally. Just to state: Not saying that every trade there is always the cheapest compared to other countries, just the limited choices of mass produced products I see around.
Apart from the Japanese participating into the war, I am looking for why they were intercepted by the nuclear bomb, could it have also been related to how well manufacturing and trading was doing, as to nothing important to trade at that time?
This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 27 February 2006 - 08:27 AM
#43
Posted 27 February 2006 - 08:12 PM
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)
#44
Posted 27 February 2006 - 09:21 PM
The US is suppose to be this gigantic warmachine. I really don't buy it any more. They only beat the Nazis because they came late when German troops were already stretched thin. The Nazi government already signed their fate when Hitlers fanatical obsession with Stalingrad destroyed the 6th army, the largest Nazi ground force ever assembled. Also, bailing out Mussolini scattered the German front even further. German armoured divisions in N.Africa was a total waste of time for the Wehrmacht. They could have been helping in Russia or helped secure better positions else where. The Russians won world war 2, imo. The Americans did support them with tanks but they were junk and Soviet soldiers hated them. The tanks could not even pierce panzer tank armour with their pea shooter cannons.
Since then they've embarked on a series of campaigns that merely served to carve up countries. There was never a decisive victory. Save Iraq, twice. But You'd think China would be a bigger concern. American companies still did business with Germany during the war. China seemed to get off real easy.
I guess I'm confused as to why the US, being so bent on stamping out communisim, did not hit it's largest supporters.
This post has been edited by Jordan: 27 February 2006 - 09:39 PM
#45
Posted 28 February 2006 - 12:54 AM
And if you'll recall stuff about the Cuban missile crisis, that was the Soviets.
Edit: Cerebral flatulence.
This post has been edited by Slade: 28 February 2006 - 12:56 AM