A question to Prequel haters Do you have the DVD's?
#31
Posted 21 February 2006 - 06:29 AM
Quote
#32
Posted 25 February 2006 - 01:21 AM
He says he did what he wanted to do, but I don't buy that for one minute.
Question!
If that's true, and he really does feel failure at whatever goal he had in mind and deserves our sympathy, then what exactly was it that he was trying to achieve through the whole debacle?
Was he trying to leech off his established franchise from years back, capitalize on a desperate fanbase, and make a ridiculous amount of money in the process? Oh, wait, he accomplished that with flying colors (and CGI).
Was he trying to break the mold he's constantly associated with and prove that he's a competent creator of movies that aren't Star Wars by making new, original movies, thus severing his name and all ties to the series? ...Whoops, my mistake. That was Alec Guinness.
Perhaps a vehicle for his own political ideals? No. Just no.
Was he trying to get the public to remember that some guy named George Lucas exists and created that one great trilogy in the Seventies with the cool special effects that was all about space? And that said public should give him awards for anything he churns out based on the greatness of that past work? ....Oh, right. He got all that and more.
Was he trying to get back into the club of people who can say they're the most powerful sons of bitches in the world? Nah, I'm reasonable sure that can't be it, but then again, he was only the 10th, 11th, and 16th ranked in Premiere's Annual power list in three consecutive years, starting 2003 (and sixth for two rows in Entertainment Weekly's Annual 101 Most Powerful People in Entertainment list).
Was he attempting to garner the approval of numerous movie critics, despite his career of claiming that their opinions don't matter to him? Unlikely, since Two out Three prequels were lauded by that tasteless lot of senile old windbags like the films were the second coming of the Christ.
Did he wish to polarize his fanbase into groups of vehement, buzzkill Puritan-esque types who will never accept his newer, inferior work regardless of whether or not his new work is actually the best thing since sliced bread, and the irrational, rabid fanboys screaming to accept anything with the Star Wars label upon it whether or not his new work makes him eligible for being tried for crimes against humanity? ...
Could it have been a cry for a People's Choice Award? No, he got that.
A spot on Discovery's "100 Greatest Americans"? No, he got that.
A Lifetime Achievement Award from the AFI? No, he got that.
Really, with the exception of a batch of fans who can see that the Emperor is completely naked, he's basically been pat on the head, toasted, and otherwise congratulated since he first announced his plans for Episode I-III.
With that much positive reinforcement, what reasons does that crazy bastard have to feel any guilt for what he has done?
This post has been edited by Harmonica: 25 February 2006 - 01:35 AM
#34
Posted 25 February 2006 - 01:50 AM
Sorry about that. Long story short, in the carrot/stick field of motivation, since the prequels were conceived, the public broke the stick, burned it, and then made Lucas Absolute Monarch/Totalitarian Dictator of Carrotopia, Land of the Orange. He's not feeling any sense of failure.
The only viable solution for those of us who didn't enjoy the Prequels: We destroy him.
This post has been edited by Harmonica: 25 February 2006 - 01:53 AM
#35
Posted 25 February 2006 - 09:21 AM
He made the film up as he went. He had no idea what he was doing and after more than a decade he became very rusty. He did not have outside help this time. He controlled the entire event.
ANH- He had very little control, even the camera man told him off.
ESB- He was rarely on set
ROTJ- weakest of the OT, he was most involved on this film
TPM, AOTC, ROTS- full involvement, owned everything, called all the shots, worst movies ever.
The guy is not capable of telling a story without assistance. He has wonderful ideas but they fall flat without some guidance from outside experitise.
I think the first movie's panning at the box office freaked Lucas out. I think for the rest of the saga Lucas was trying to fill in things that he screwed up from the last film. Less Jar Jar, more action, etc...
The films had nothing. Heck, every villain was used as a means to service the hero's skill. They had no other role. Dooku and Maul both served their entire purpose by dieing at the hands of Jedi. It was pathetic.
#37
Posted 27 February 2006 - 11:25 PM
Given that pandering to the fanbase would imply that there were moments in each movie that the fanbase had asked for, I'm gonna have to ask you to elaborate on what moments you're referring to. For the life of me, I can't think of a single moment that could have worked even on paper.
If that were true, wouldn't he have fixed three of the most uniformly loathed parts of Episode I? I speak here of course of Jar Jar himself, child actors, and Midi-chlorians. It wouldn't have salvaged the immense clusterfuck that was the Prequels, but it at least would have demonstrated a mind open to the will of the people who made him Richer Than God.
I mean, Jar Jar earned a Razzie for Worst Supporting Actor, accusations of racism, and the fierce, undying hatred of, on a rough estimate, just about the entire world. Now, a person who actually has a concept of what the word "Feedback" means would have taken the time (all five seconds) and removed Jar Jar from all following movies. It's not that hard to do when you're writer/director/producer/slavedriver/fully responsible for the entire movie. All it takes it a couple blots of spilled ink on the script to nullify Jar Jar forever. Instead, he just went from uncomical comic relief to important character(!) in Episode II and then finally took a drastic cut in lines and screentime for Episode III.
Though, to me, that last cameo always seemed incredibly passive-aggressive, like Lucas was purposely trying to send the message "I understand that you all hate Jar Jar and want him gone, so I'm taking away most of his presence. But he is still going to be in the damn movie!" This was eventually followed by that lovely surgical insertion of Jar Jar's Gungan brethren into the Original movies by way of DVDs. Petty punishment? Symbolism of some sort? Total insanity? The world may never know.
Everyone was also pretty clear in their opinions of Jake Lloyd as a mini-Darth Vader: Disgust. Going from crushing people's throats with your mind to hugging your (quite obviously doomed) mother and flirting(?!!) with your (quite obviously
But apparently, George Lucas's
Yet both of those last two examples are laughable in comparison to the midi-chlorian mess. At best, a pointless throwaway line of little significance, it was at worst the part of Episode I that provoked cries of "George Lucas raped my childhood!"(He did) and "I hate George Lucas!"(I do) more than any other part of the movie. The fact that people disliked/hated it on an almost universal level should have been enough to persuade that flanneled whacko to never again mention that concept (or heck, have it revealed that Qui-Gonn and co were doing Spice at the time, and everything they said about the subject was pure nonsense). It's not like it bore any significant impact on the plot. It was just a stupid idea used so that a little kid could have more of something than Yoda to establish awe and then explain the whole "Fatherless conception" joke. He had a chance to follow the wishes of the masses and covertly Stalinize Midi-Chlorians from the script, the following movies, and Star Wars in general, but he refused to take it and kill them, thus avoiding doing his fans a single favor in the whole mess of things. Jerk.
Me, I subscribe to the theory that after the original trilogy concluded, Lucas erected a wall, denser and more powerful than if you were to fuse both the Berlin Wall and the Great Wall of China into some sort of recombinant Super Wall amalgamation. And that that wall is currently guarded by Russian cowboys, giant scary Alaskan men with chainguns, invisible undead cyborg Ninjas, and Jack Nicholson, all with orders to murder anything that approaches (especially fresh, original ideas and information). This wall is approximately 100 meters thick, titanium-plated, underground, ray-shielded, and covered in cortosis ore in case any Jedis try to attack. A wall prophesized to bring Balance to movies by creating three hideous disasters to counter the three kickass Original movies. This wall that legends speak of is Lucas's skull, which acts as a barricade to block out any perceptions of reality, outside input, criticism, and most of all reason. Inside this impenetrable vault lie the worst ideas since daytime television, the Quizno's talking baby, and Crossing the Streams. Ideas that gave rise to the prequels. He has no thoughts of what the fans want and no desire to find out. And anyway, all being rewarded for these ideas does is make the incredibly aged and stale, but chewy, nougat brain beneath the crunchy candy shell exterior spoil further.
With all the kudos he's managing to get for all our trouble, I don't even want to think about what he's planning next for Star Wars.
#38
Posted 28 February 2006 - 12:28 AM
That was beautiful.
"And the Evil that was vanquished shall rise anew. Wrapped in the guise of man shall he walk amongst the innocent and Terror shall consume they that dwell upon the Earth. The skies will rain fire. The seas shall become as blood. The righteous shall fall before the wicked! And all creation shall tremble before the burning standards of Hell!" - Mephisto
Kurgan X showed me this web comic done with Legos. It pokes fun at all six Star Wars films and I found it to be extremely entertaining.
<a href="http://www.irregularwebcomic.net/cast/starwars.html" target="_blank">http://www.irregularwebcomic.net/cast/starwars.html</a>
#39
Posted 28 February 2006 - 06:16 AM
The opening line of TPM being "I've got a bad feling about this." Later, "R2-D2, meet C3P0." Introducing child version of Greedo )yes, it was Greedo). The interconnecedness of all the main characters with events in the films that would follow, including basing the entire universe on Tatooine. Despite changing the backstory, introducing Owen and Beru as younger people. Young Tarkin. Chewbacca. Yoda. Fuck, Yoda, who should have lived on Dagobah sitting in an Ivory Tower on some "Jedi Council." Repetition of notion that someone is "too old" to train, despite being 15 years younger than the last guy we heard that of. Young Boba Fett. The young Death Star. ET, Willow. Anikin in the Vader suit, yelling "nooooooo."
Lucas thought fans would like these things, but they're not actually there to service the stories they're in: they're nods to the fans of the other films. They're a series of piss-takes, and while one or two might have been fine, the series is weighed down by them, so that you can feel the clunkiness of the references. Lucas messed these prequels up. He would have done better to write a completely separate trilogy, and then as an afterthought worked out a way to connect it with the OT, and do all of the integration after the first bit of writing. Figure out which characters could and should be used, which couldn't and shouldn't.
I'm not saying he wasn't successful. I didn't see the second or third one, but I know they have their fans and they made their money. The argument that they were good because they made money is a weak one. By that account THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT is the greatest horror film ever made, and ... well, come on.
This post has been edited by civilian_number_two: 28 February 2006 - 06:16 AM
#40
Posted 01 March 2006 - 11:58 PM
This is all true, but the point I was trying to establish was that fans had never asked to see any of that junk and that few, if any, of these concepts worked even on a theoretical level. Hell, even communism works on paper. The stuff above? That all fails spectacularly. There was not a single reason for any of it. I imagine the closest fans got to actually requesting any of that was when some fan at some convention commented to another "Y'know, I wonder how R2-D2 met C3P0." On the other side of the world, Lucas no doubt paused in the middle of his daily gambol on his mountain of cash to say "...Georgy Sense... TINKLING..." and then rushed to include that completely unnecesary scene in the movie. No doubt fans the world over felt.... A disturbance... At that point, any screenwriter worth his salt would have performed emergency surgery on that script and removed every single one of those cancerous references, even if it required torching the entire thing. The fire would have been justice.
Oh, I agree with you 110% on the fact that each nod is completely extraneous and entirely pointless. However, I'm speculating that the intent of these was not "to please" but instead "to alienate". Throughout the whole trilogy, I got the feeling that Lucas had recently watched Hans Gruber saying to John McClane "If I kill enough hostages, sooner or later I am going to get to someone you *do* care about" and had adopted that mentality for totally unraveling whatever intrigue any characters from the Original Trilogy did (Bastard!).
I come to this conclusion primarily because all those little self-references did was remind the audience that they were watching a Star Wars movie. Unfortunately, this backfired since, when one has a movie on shakey ground, it's a bad idea to constantly remind the audience of vastly superior movies. Sure, all prequels and sequels do this to some extent, but he sacrificed a significant chunk of possible quality he may have had and any chances of the Prequels standing alone and being good in their own right by fettering it to movies they could never compare with. And the completely ludicrous ways he made these references (at least it's possible to occasionally overlook "1138" in the older movies) suggests to me that these were less attempts to satisfy, but more like attempts to sucker in an unreasonable quantity of fans with lures of "But a character you know is in the movie! And has seven versions of its own toy! Regardless of if it defenestrates concepts that came before!
For example, I imagine that conception of Episode III's most lackwitted scene involved an exchange like this:
Lucas: Hey, Darth Vader?
Vader: Yeah?
Lucas: Remember, Vader, when I promised to ruin your character last?
Vader: That's right, Lucas! You did!
Lucas: I lied.
Vader: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
I mean, seriously. In what universe was James Earl Jones screaming that a good idea that enhanced the character? It was so bad, I missed the next several lines because the audience I was with was roaring in laughter like they were going to keel over and have badly animated angel versions of themselves fly off. And this was an audience that cheered when Obi-Wan
Anyway, the abundance of superfluous additions, pointless plotpoints, lack of any regard for fanbase-based criticism, and utter dismantling of characters indicates, to me, volumes of contempt for his fans. Like he purposely wanted to con them in and then disappoint them. Spiteful lunatic. At this point, my mind goes to a quote from Rembrandt. "Paint with the same joy that you would use to make love to a woman." And if that's how Lucas creates movies, it's no wonder that he had to adopt his kids.
#41
Posted 03 March 2006 - 11:51 PM
I do have to say, there is some amazing SFX in it, but it is so chaotic! It's impossible to figure out what's going on. This is so anti-original Star Wars, I can't even describe it. Is it because Lucas based the ANH trench run on an established film make that sequence so much better than the ROTS battle--which is based on...??? what? And I find it so much less engaging.
I'm really trying to be more embracing of CGI because I really have no choice. It is the way of the future. It is the future of filmmaking whether I wish we could backtrack a bit and go back into models and great sets. I just have no voice in the matter other than not supporting it with my hard earned money.
Anyway, as I was saying, I was trying to give ROTS a chance and had to stop. I popped in "Land of the Dead" and watched that for awhile---actually enjoying it.
I will get back to ROTS when I feel the mood again, but is so difficult. I just know when I get to the scene with Jar Jar in it, it's going to be impossible to not switch it off.
God, I really do envy the gushers. I wish I could see the film through their eyes, but I just can't. I don't see what they see. I'm glad they enjoy it. They have so many years ahead of them discussing it and the television series which I have zero interest right now. I've just got to drop this whole Star Wars shit. I've just got to, but... are other people as obsessed about it as I am? Even if I think the prequels suck? Something's wrong there. Very wrong. Maybe I need to see a shrink and learn why.... then get over it and move on... (yeah, I 've said that before, but here I am again...)
Thanks for your time.
Battle for the Galaxy--read the "other Star Wars"
All I know is I haven't seen the real prequels yet.
#42
Posted 04 March 2006 - 09:49 AM
The PT is like an unenviable neigborhood I once visited. There's no desire to go back for sightseeing.
That SW Insider rag has a portion devoted to people who turn rooms of their house into SW collections. Primarily I suppose it is to bolster future sales of an inexhaustible supply of molded plastic, but to THESE jaundiced eyes, these people come off as SAD. Any cajones they have ought to call for spring cleaning. But like post-NNNOOOOOOO Vader, mindless saps cling to the brand.
#44
Posted 26 March 2006 - 08:24 PM
if only nerds could fight, eh?
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)