Are we talking about promiscuity being wrong for some reasons or allowing people to take up risky activities?
Telling people not to have sex because they can contract SDT is like tell people not to climb K2 because you can get killed by bad weather. I think the ratio of people who had orgasms to people who died of syphilis is just about that - the amount of people who tried to climb K2 to the amount of people who died there...or maybe even less. I am not sure.
My opinion on this matter is mixed with opinions from the threat of STD's and of people I know, both men and women, who have massive loads of sex without worrying about accidently getting a women pregnant (or getting pregnant themselves). Living in a country of 20,000,000 people were at least 80,000 women have abortions each year.
I would just like to make it clear that my anger is not directed at women but rather at men, thats why even though Im against Abortion (which would mean Im some kind of anti-feminist) I am also for finding the biological father of the child and making him responsible for the child as much as the mother.
Now I might think in an old fashioned 'Middle Ages' way, but I believe that sex is an act for making babies, if you want sex for pleasure there is such a thing called Oral Sex.
No, by no means it was an insult directed to you telling you to "eat shit". It was a saying, a metaphore telling that the prevalency of activities, (=opinion) does not necessarily justify the said activity (=opinion). "Eating shit" is something unpleasant (=bad opinion) which is tasty (=acceptable) to millions of flies (=people), however to people (=minority of people) it is disgusting.
My opinions are different the the majority, I assure you.
Although you could have just said the great proverb:
"What is right is not always popular... what is popular is not always right."
This post has been edited by Cobnat: 18 August 2006 - 11:58 PM