KIng Kong
#1
Posted 07 December 2005 - 08:07 PM
I know what you are all thinking, but the commercial for this movie gave me chills the other day. It actually gave me chills. So i decided to pop in my vhs recording of the old one and watched it.(better now that i am old enough to care about the plot, not just the giant ape eating people.) I am really excited. Before this, i only had two must-see-in-theaters movies, Narnia and harry potter, (have yet to see them) but now King Kong has topped them both. The scenes in the trailer, where the old WWII planes approach, WOW, it just gave me serious chills. Peter jackson wont let me down, this will be great.
"Life is too important to be taken seriously."
#2
Posted 07 December 2005 - 11:26 PM
And it's getting good reviews. If it were SW, at this point the prequel camp would be countering.
It's interesting that so much of KK is CGI and there's not that criticism a PT film would automatically receive. I'm not validating the Lucas approach. However, I am looking forward to a methodically produced example of this technology without the Mucas touch.
It's interesting that so much of KK is CGI and there's not that criticism a PT film would automatically receive. I'm not validating the Lucas approach. However, I am looking forward to a methodically produced example of this technology without the Mucas touch.
#4
Posted 08 December 2005 - 08:11 PM
seems?
>>The Adventures of Heinrich Von Bastard<< (A Web Comic)
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)
#5
Posted 10 December 2005 - 09:59 AM
QUOTE (Revan-47 @ Dec 8 2005, 01:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It seems like the CGI in star wars looks a lot worse then in other movies.
Could be because George Lucas is a CGI addict who overuses CGI to the extremes, no doubt as an extension of his control freak personality. Since perfecting CGI takes forever, some prefer to use it only sparingly and continue to opt for models or men in prosthetic make-up, etc.
I am the Fisher King.
I'd like a qui-gon jinn please with an obi-wan to go.
I'd like a qui-gon jinn please with an obi-wan to go.
#6
Posted 10 December 2005 - 02:06 PM
QUOTE (Lord Aquaman @ Dec 10 2005, 10:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Since perfecting CGI takes forever,
I think you hit the nail on the head, Lord Aquaman.And that's the problem with boldly presenting an understood presentation in a completely different medium. Lucas was in such a rush to stay ahead of the SFX/CGI schedules (an environment where the response to "do that! do this!" becomes far less immediate), that motive and voice were to a great extent ignored.
Until post-production of course.
#8
Posted 12 December 2005 - 09:48 AM
QUOTE (Despondent @ Dec 7 2005, 11:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
And it's getting good reviews. If it were SW, at this point the prequel camp would be countering.
It's interesting that so much of KK is CGI and there's not that criticism a PT film would automatically receive. I'm not validating the Lucas approach. However, I am looking forward to a methodically produced example of this technology without the Mucas touch.
It's interesting that so much of KK is CGI and there's not that criticism a PT film would automatically receive. I'm not validating the Lucas approach. However, I am looking forward to a methodically produced example of this technology without the Mucas touch.
The difference is that SW has so much stuff that didn't need to be CGI that was. I'm sure that it's pretty hard to get cool fight scenes with a guy in a monkey suit.
It was great to see that some of the models in Narnia were actually guys in suits. I think they look more real than the shiny CGI.
QUOTE (Theodor Herzl)
If you will it, it is no dream.
#9
Posted 12 December 2005 - 08:18 PM
King Kong is 'virtually' a guy in a suit.
Andy Sirkis (Gollum) and Weta Digital have teamed up again to make Kong. He is not a straight up CGI creation, he is based on the movements of Sirkis as gollum was. And he studied apes, so what we get should be pretty awsome.
Andy Sirkis (Gollum) and Weta Digital have teamed up again to make Kong. He is not a straight up CGI creation, he is based on the movements of Sirkis as gollum was. And he studied apes, so what we get should be pretty awsome.
>>The Adventures of Heinrich Von Bastard<< (A Web Comic)
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)
#12
Posted 16 December 2005 - 11:30 PM
I'm hoping so. My friend, however, is more skeptical. He denounced it as 'Just a movie about a big monkey'.
That would be "Mighty Joe Young" or "Gorillas in the Mist."
This is KONG, baby!
That would be "Mighty Joe Young" or "Gorillas in the Mist."
This is KONG, baby!
Flying Ferret
Battle for the Galaxy--read the "other Star Wars"
All I know is I haven't seen the real prequels yet.
Battle for the Galaxy--read the "other Star Wars"
All I know is I haven't seen the real prequels yet.
#13
Posted 17 December 2005 - 03:48 AM
Im sure its great and all, but 3 HOURS from source material of, what, 1hr 30min? someone let the monkey off the leesh.
Oh yeah, its all those Oscars he got. I forgot.
Oh yeah, its all those Oscars he got. I forgot.