Snake Logan - Viewing Profile

Snake Logan's Profile User Rating:

Reputation: 0 Neutral

Group:: Members
Active Posts:: 594 (0.1 per day)
Most Active In:: Debate Club (318 posts)
Joined:: 05-December 07
Profile Views:: 21,861
Last Active:: Feb 18 2008 10:53 PM
Currently:: Offline

Previous Fields

Country:: Australia

Latest Visitors

CJ Marren
16 Jan 2013 - 05:42
Jordan
16 Oct 2011 - 01:29
J m HofMarN
17 Apr 2009 - 00:42
TheOrator
16 Nov 2008 - 23:29
Spoon Poetic
11 Nov 2008 - 00:39
Itaritz
13 Sep 2008 - 22:15
arien
02 Aug 2008 - 18:54
joshofalltrades
27 Jun 2008 - 15:35
Patch
07 May 2008 - 22:47
Lil
28 Apr 2008 - 15:09

Snake Logan has not set their status

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Girl Kebabs

Posted 18 Feb 2008

QUOTE (Spoon @ Feb 19 2008, 12:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
...We shouldn't eat mammals because we are omnivores? Meaning, eating both of meat and plants? I've said it once, I'll say it again - invest in a dictionary.

Omnivores cannot eat plants or raw red meat (mammals).
Omnivores can eat fruits, vegetables and raw white meat (fish, reptiles, amphibians and birds).

Carnivores cannot eat fruits, vegetables or plants.
Carnivores can eat raw red meat and raw white meat.

Herbivores cannot eat raw red meat or raw white meat.
Herbivores can eat plants, fruits and vegetables.

This picture expresses my feelings towards your ignorance and arrogance.
In Topic: What could be better than a kangaroo court?

Posted 18 Feb 2008

QUOTE (J m HofMarN @ Feb 18 2008, 08:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That was not a source. that was an article that off handedly accused the taliban of making economic restrictions (ordering stores to close on friday is an economic restriction, not economic planning) If that was a source then your source needs to site its sources. And once again theres no way to prove a negative. But when I think state economic planning I do not think Taliban. Neither would any other sane person.

Give me a valid source that proves that the Taliban had an unplanned economy.

QUOTE (J m HofMarN @ Feb 18 2008, 08:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Theyre really not Westernised. The Talib had very little connection with the US but were handled by Pakistani intelligence who shifted US materiel to them. The West happened to have interests that coincided with the taliban, thats it. I doubt they ever actually took orders from the US.

Fine but ask yourself how long the Taliban would have been in control of Afghanistan had America not sought Al Qaeda.

QUOTE (J m HofMarN @ Feb 18 2008, 08:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
A counterclaim is not a requirement of a good argument, and the Taliban don't need a label. They were a theocracy if you absolutely need some label for them.

They are theocrats? So why was the army in control and not the imams?

QUOTE (J m HofMarN @ Feb 18 2008, 08:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Like the iroquois before you you are a communalist.

Bah! You have found out my secret! Yes, I want a tribal state where people slaughter each other for every scrap of food. (sarcasm)

QUOTE (J m HofMarN @ Feb 18 2008, 08:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Once again your citations are general statements. The main article that that statement SUMMARIZES is incomplete and has nothing on Pakistan's amount of involvement in the formation of the Taliban. The only thing it says is exactly what you quoted. It's the bare bones of an argument at best and at worst its just another sentence that you read and took for gospel without looking into the details in the slightest.

How can one faction defeat all the other warlords without foreign help?

QUOTE (J m HofMarN @ Feb 18 2008, 08:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Ummm yeah man I'm not a big fan of the West here, and imperialism did do some fucked up shit... .But in this instance I'm not going to blame the west for the existence of the taliban and al qaeda entirely.

You blame them for coming to power. Well had they not helped the Jihadists in the 80s destabilize Afghanistan in the first place, I doubt we would be discussing if their helping the Taliban is bad or not.
In Topic: Your Avatar

Posted 18 Feb 2008

QUOTE (Dr Lecter @ Feb 19 2008, 08:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<---- Still John Lennon, as it has been since the day I joined this forum.

Is it supposed to be symbolic?
In Topic: Girl Kebabs

Posted 18 Feb 2008

QUOTE (Casual @ Feb 18 2008, 07:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Exactly it’s actually really bad for you mammals are not supposed to cannibalise each other that’s how the BSE thing started. Anyway I was referring more to the psychological aspect of finding out you'd just eaten human meat I don’t know about you but I'd be scarred for life.

Honestly, it wouldn’t have any affect on me. I wouldn’t go out of my way to eat human meat but if I already had then there is not much point in being emotional about it. And what the hell is wrong with humans? We are omnivores! We shouldn’t be eating mammals!

QUOTE (barend @ Feb 19 2008, 10:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'd still be more traumatised by the fact that some greasy kebab shop had previously inserted his cock into what was now the filling of my lunch.

I don’t think he put her lower abdomen into the kebabs. I think it would have been too obvious.
In Topic: Bomb in the Oven

Posted 18 Feb 2008

QUOTE (barend @ Feb 19 2008, 10:07 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
4. Does she get 17 virgins in the afterlife? (assuming there is one for women)

The bad thing about this is that virgin men are really bad in bed. That’s assuming she isn’t one of the virgins in which case she’ll be raped for all eternity.