This post has been edited by civilian_number_two: 10 November 2008 - 03:23 PM
uncovered from the sands of the net an archeological discovery
#16
Posted 10 November 2008 - 03:21 PM
#17
Posted 11 November 2008 - 12:28 AM
And no, not anyone but me can see that. Slade, Civ and myself all had quite a few debates with him which proved quite humorous. You're the only one who, in defense of some jackass you've never met, has decided that he is clearly a ten year old boy. Why, I have no idea, because you've only got a few poorly written essays and stories to judge by.
And I wasn't singling out users from Australia, I was singling out losers from Australia. Hope that puts it in perspective for you. Also, Cobnat hung out with Snake. Is Cobnat also a ten year old? Perhaps you can illuminate this mystery for me.
Or, hey, better yet, stop making baseless and insane assumptions about idiots you've never met. Just because his writing sucks does not mean he is a child. George Lucas' writing is immature/childish too, but I defy you to go accuse Chefelf of picking on children as the result of your lunatic assumptions.
Quote
#18
Posted 11 November 2008 - 12:41 AM
I was involved in those debates too... In fact I'm pretty sure his last post ever was when I learned him a thing or two about omnivores.
This post has been edited by Spoon Poetic: 11 November 2008 - 12:42 AM
#19
Posted 11 November 2008 - 04:53 AM
AFTER Hoffman wrote the essay. But you have a point, I suppose if they want to be dickheads to one another then I should stay out of it... lest I be targeted by mentally unstable pseudo writers from all sides.
Are you telling me that his writing is... what? Coherent? Deep? Profound? Intelligible? Think about it: Why is the writing on the side of his blog so different from the one in his reviews/stories/poems? If he is not a child then he IS mentally unstable as I insinuated before (possibly schizophrenic and/or bipolar). Either that or the person who wrote the "citations" isn't the same person who wrote the reviews/stories/poems.
-Jimmy McTavern, 1938.
#20
Posted 11 November 2008 - 05:02 AM
Deaucon- I'm still quite curious as to why you're so very interested in defending Mr. Logan. Is there some connection we don't know about? Are you his father or something? If so, I can clearly see the family resemblance.
And just because writing sucks, doesn't mean it is the writing of a child. Plenty of people are idiots, for instance, one might think it rather immature to just randomly guess someone's age over the internet, then make accusations against people based on that random guess, also over the internet.
So, what it comes down to is, go report me for e-child abuse somewhere else, your time in this thread is over.
Quote
#21
Posted 11 November 2008 - 05:42 AM
This is not so much about defending Logan as it is about attacking you. Logan is ultimately irrelevant in all this.
My only "connection" to Logan before this was you mentioning him and me in the same sentence a few months ago. And now I also have a "connection" to Cobnat as we have both been insulted by the same mentally unstable pseudo writer. Well at least this time there is no mention of segregation by said writer.
Yes, we all know how trigger happy you are with that delete button... perhaps it comes from your idolization of internet tyrants such as Buckley? Before you do anything drastic/stupid, know that it would be a bad idea to delete anyone of my posts in this or any other thread.
-Jimmy McTavern, 1938.
#22
Posted 11 November 2008 - 06:50 AM
To my knowledge, there's no such thing as a "bad idea" when it comes to deleting irrelevant troll posts.
Quote
#23
Posted 11 November 2008 - 09:50 PM
"JM Hoffmarn and Snake Logan have a history in these forums."
I have read lots of Snake's writing, and I can compare it with the writing of people I know to be bipolar or schizophrenic. He's just a troll, and yes, this is the internet where sometimes trolls are best ignored, and where sometimes it is fun to kick them around.
You are right that Snake is not smart enough to survive an attack from JM Hoffmarn. For Christ's sake, he would not be smart enough to survive an attack from Sarah Palin. But who cares? He wants to pick fights and post pictures, he wants to lob terrible insults at folks on the internet (which all came BEFORE any "essay" from JM, trust me (I saw a paragraph, not an essay)), he is going to have some fun lobbed back his way. By your argument, JM should just ignore him, even if it would be fun to do otherwise.
You're entitled to defend him all you like, on whatever spurious high ground you may claim, but I will answer these points:
1. He is not a child.
2. He is neither schizophrenic nor bipolar.
3. He started it.
Unless you have something else, you have no argument.
#24
Posted 11 November 2008 - 10:02 PM
We can't be sure.
Also, Deuc, how can you pretend there's any integrity in an argument you yourself have said is merely a facade for a larger battle against JM?
Also, saying it would be a "bad idea" for JM to delete your posts, is that some kind of threat? Seriously?
-John Carpenter's They Live
"God help us...in the future."
-Plan 9 from Outer Space
nooooo
#25
Posted 11 November 2008 - 10:51 PM
Oi, now that's just rude. I know several of schizophrenic and/or bipolar people. Their writing is far more coherent than Snake's. Do you actually have any knowledge of what being schizophrenic or bipolar entails? Or are you just trying to come up with a few well-known diseases?
How about I say he has post-traumatic stress disorder and/or Munchausen's by proxy and my statement makes exactly as much sense as yours does.
And additionally, I like to at least believe that there is some level of maturity on this site.
You yourself admitted you don't actually care about JM making fun of kids or cripples or whatever... Is fighting over this REALLY worth it? What exactly are you hoping to accomplish? Because right now all you're doing is making yourself look an ass.
PM me, we'll talk.
#26
Posted 12 November 2008 - 11:35 PM
Ya know what the best way to get your post deleted is, besides insulting the forum moderator? It's to threaten the moderator that bad things will happen if your post is deleted.
I look forward to you executing myself/my family so as to make an example of me for the others.
Quote
#27
Posted 12 November 2008 - 11:44 PM
You can't attack me. What if I'm a schizophrenic ten year old?
If you're going to open an e-psychiatry business, you should charge some money. Or do you just diagnose me/Snake as mentally unstable, and then demand a fee to actually reveal to the rest of the site what's wrong with me/him. Oh, and knowing what the hell you're on about might help too. But what do I know, I'm manic depressive, and it's not like manic depressive disorder is common in many of the most brilliant people in society or anything.
Yes. Yes I am. That's why, if you look through the archives, there are like four posts that I've deleted, and they're all by you, and they're all trolling. You come to my forums for the explicit purpose of bothering me and my [alleged] readership, and then cry when your posts get deleted because they're insulting and off topic.
Also, "don't do anything drastic" is something that one person says to another person when they're both holding guns. When typed on the internet, in the context of deleting a single post, it looks really silly.
Speaking of which, Slade is still waiting for you to strike down upon him with great wrath and furious anger for the time he deleted your silly internet survey thread in the debate club. Are you just waiting to have us both killed at once, or are your threats utterly impotent.
(My money is on the latter)
This post has been edited by J m HofMarN: 12 November 2008 - 11:53 PM
Quote
#29
Posted 13 November 2008 - 09:41 PM
JM: I did find the severed <head> of a forum post in my bed the other day. Maybe that was from that time I deleted his "Every Debate Ever, All At Once" thread?
#30
Posted 16 November 2008 - 09:38 PM
Quote